Neo-secularism

Secularism is the best of possible ways for global justice. Only independent, impatial and dogma-less secular justice makes multicultural fairness realizeable. It should develop along with the best possible contemporary secular rationality. "Global" here refers to a complex world order links by international trades and communications. Unless there is clear harm to their very existence or abuse, those outside the domain should be left alone in their best natural state. Our so called "civilization" tends to be aggressive and already committed cultural genocides. On the other hand, as minimal as it should be, there is an urgency to formulate a more efficient, secular frame of reference, "global" value and enforcing system that is anti-trust. As of its very anti-trust essense, those practice or provide one-sided supports of (neo/quasi)fascist, non-secular politics (in its narrow sense), other monopolistic systems or violation of the global values shall be treated as given up their rights to judge, to enforce and to be treated equally. "Justice must be seen to be done." Therefore, the judiciary and enforcement rights shall be in the hands of consented developed free-worlds with a quorum that can ensure efficacy.

Complex Potentials

Singularity was certainly not as homogeneous as it sound. It's there with complex potentials of causality: shades, shapes, colors, dynamics, vortices etc. The word can be misleading for a novice. If "it" were homogeneous, there wouldn't be universes as we could perceived today, because there wouldn't be lives, we wouldn't "be" and no perception would exist. Imagine! A world with no sense of boredom, feels and meanings. As of its homogeneity, there would be only one thing, yet it's nothing.

Like words, potentials also differ and defer in time and space. Natural potentials are hardly equal.

Potentials "real"-ize themselves through anisotropy and releasing their powers. Under neopragmatic context, the authentic "real" ought to be something healthy and producing proper results.

Thus, better avoid saying "I understood this guy." after seeing tip of an iceberg or try to clone him.

Complexity is a noun, not verb. Thus, related action may or may not be complex.

An interesting technical link.

ETTanism

ETTanism is opionionistic, introductory skeleton for further development and edifying. This means accepting and interpreting the contents at your own risks. Opinionism has to be there as the author can't deal with every aspects at once in the same time and space. Furthermore, the subjective interpretations, which are also subject to multi-level interpretations, are hardly stable. If the result is wrong, more often than not, the interpretation &/ application would need re-examination, as it is best to assume the author intended proper results in the long run.

Nevertheless, it can be a powerful tool when it meets with facts, results or cogency. Causality exerts itself, sometimes in chaotic or near chaotic ways, in broader perspective, like it or not. Weak? Maybe, yet the stone-piercing power is there in the long run. Treating opinions opinionistically coheres logically and can be assertive in many situations. It is not something all-embracing. The audience are encouraged to use their brain instead of passive data-feeding. Self-criticize factually if necessary; self-compete rather than the-other-compete. The presenter has the right of final says as to his presentations, especially when others interpretation is palpably leading to contradictions, injustice, improper repercussions or long term effects. Yet, this is by no mean a restriction to legal freedom of speech.

Present tense is used in quotation of authority as if having live encounter. Authentic presentations or representations speak to us, they are alive.

Opionion is opinion. Causality is causality. There is no intention to "encounter" those obsessed with competition, incitement, mud-throwing and framing others. Wicked interpretations r normally not hard to c. The interpreter should bear the responsibility for their relevant consequences.

Some of my thoughts here are formulated ages back and my data were stolen many times. Challenges of their originality are welcome.

The edifying philosopher, coined by Rorty, should be earned, not declared.

If you don't understand, don't pretend to be.