Neo-neologism

In late philosophy, neologism is a sarcasm rather than metaphysics or even an entity. "New"-ing just for the sack of "new"-ing yet it may not be something new; being creative just for the sack of creativism; critical just for the sack of criticism. Psychological issues other than the related jargon do take part. While it can be unavoidable sometimes, cyclical and going no where it can be. Thus, neo-neologism has to be something wholistically pragmatic to break the deadlock. It must result in question like:"When the momentum of the keep on double-folding world economy IRL going to end?", "Why some pseudo-democratic regimes seem 'sustainable' in the name of 'pragmatism'?" And, these r not something of much new.